a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writers own insights. Acceptable, visual Presentation, cover page with relevant info, including descriptive title. Paper presents reasonable analysis and synthesis. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Abstract is not the proper length. Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Adapted from: Whalen,. The evidence comes from many valid sources.
There is a logical flow to the topics/arguments. Arguments are logical, and supported with evidence. Conclusion follows from the rest of the paper.
Research paper on biofertilizer
Craig stanford and essays
Cites some data obtained from other sources. Main points not discernible. Arguments rarely, if at all, logical and supported. Main points present, not well made. The evidence used reflects multiple views. Paper presents well-developed analysis and synthesis. Thesis is clear and appropriate. Conclusion follows clearly from the arguments presented. Nuance, inference and subtlety lacking. Labels for degrees of success are descriptive (Expert Proficient, etc.